We Don't Just Tolerate Criticism—We Require It
This framework is open source. Bad ideas should be killed early. Good ideas from anywhere get assimilated. If you think something is wrong, tell us why. Specifically.
If you're right, we update it. If you're wrong, the challenge makes the framework stronger. Either way, the ideas improve.
Challenge a Principle
Point out a flaw in the logic. Explain why a principle won't work. Show us where we're wrong.
Propose an Improvement
Suggest a modification that strengthens accountability. Add nuance. Refine implementation details.
Submit Evidence
Document real-world examples where accountability failed—or where it worked. Help build the case.
Ask Hard Questions
Point out contradictions. Raise implementation challenges. Make us think harder.
Submission Guidelines
- Be Specific: "This is bad" doesn't help. "Principle 2 fails in scenario X because Y" does.
- Cite Evidence: If you're making factual claims, link to sources. We verify everything.
- Stay on Topic: Focus on the accountability framework itself, not partisan politics.
- No Trolling: Genuine criticism is welcome. Bad faith attacks are ignored.
- Anonymity Respected: You can submit anonymously or with a pseudonym. We'll credit you however you prefer.
Submit Your Proposal
Note: This is a placeholder form. Full submission functionality will be implemented once the server is deployed.
What Happens Next?
1 Review
We review all submissions for good faith and relevance. Spam and trolling are filtered out. Genuine challenges and improvements go to step 2.
2 Public Discussion
Promising ideas are published (with attribution as you requested) for community discussion. Not behind closed doors—in public view. Others can weigh in.
3 Decision
If the criticism is valid or the improvement strengthens the framework, we integrate it. If not, we explain why publicly. Transparency in decision-making.
4 Changelog Update
Every modification is documented on the Updates page with full rationale. You can see how and why the framework evolves.
5 Credit Given
Contributors are acknowledged (by pseudonym if preferred). Good ideas deserve recognition, regardless of who has them.
The Standard
Does it reduce the gap between individual incentive and collective good?
Does it make accountability concrete rather than abstract?
Does it protect the innocent?
If yes, we assimilate it. Like improving software: find the bugs, fix them, ship the update.